In this notice of motion, discharged by consent, the court disposed of the application relying on minutes executed by parties. No substantive legal question was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3128 OF 2006
IN
SUIT NO.853 OF 2003
Mohamed Farooq S/o.Abdul
Aziz & Ors. ..Plaintiffs.
Vs.
Samsher Ahmed Siddiqui
S/o. Abdul Khalik & Ors. ..Defendants.
And
Janakaklyan Sahakari Bank Ltd. ..Applicants.
Ms.Kranti Hiwrale i/b.Mr.P.G.Lad for the Plaintiffs.
Mr.J.B.Singh for Defendant Nos.1A to 1E and 2.
Mr.Rajesh Singh for Defendant No.3.
Mr.S.A.Bhagwat i/b.V.Deshpande & Co. for the
Applicants.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
CORAM : 19TH OCTOBER, 2006
P.C. :
By consent, the Notice of Motion is heard
finally.
2. The Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.1(a), 1(b), 2
and 3 are present in person.
3. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in terms of
the consent minutes of the order executed by the
parties and their Advocates, taken on record and
:2:
marked ‘X’.
Mohamed Farooq S/o.Abdul Aziz & Ors.
Samsher Ahmed Siddiqui S/o. Abdul Khalik & Ors.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court