Dismissed
ila vipin pandya v. smita patel(1) and ms fereshte sethna (2)
Bombay HCNMS/194/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.194 OF 2006 IN SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.1361 OF 2005 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.48 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO.685 OF 2004 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1038 OF 2004 IN MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2004 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.17 OF 1996 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.132 OF 1996
Illa Vipin Pandya. Vs. Smita Ambalal Patel.
...Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Mr.S. H. Doctor, Senior Advocate with Mr. J.P. Sen and Mr.I. D. Cruz i/b. Mehta & Girdharilal for the Petitioner. Ms.Smita Patel in person.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
October 5, 2006 .
P.C.
In view of the disposal of the Contempt Petition, no separate orders are required on the Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is accordingly dismissed.
Illa Vipin Pandya
Smita Ambalal Patel
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court