The Highest Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a notice of motion filed by the appellant seeking modification of an arbitration-related order dated 24th November, 2005, finding no justification for modification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4010 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2711 OF 2005 IN APPEAL NO.7935 OF 2005 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.434 OF 2004
V/O "TYAZHPROMEXPORT" .. Appellant
v/s.
Mukand Limited .. Respondent
Mr.R.A.Dada, Senior Counsel with Mr.P.K.Samdani i/by Mr.A.T.Agarwal for the appellant.
Mr.D.D.Madon, Senior Counsel with Mr.Birendra Saraf i/by M/s.Udwadia & Udeshi for the respondent.
CORAM : R.M.LODHA AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED : 9th January, 2006
P.C.
Heard.
the order dated 24th November, 2005.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dated 24th November, 2005 should be modified.
V/O "TYAZHPROMEXPORT"
Mukand Limited
R.M. LODHA
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
