The Bombay High Court allowed a notice of motion under ordinary original civil jurisdiction and disposed of the motion based on the prayer clause (a) without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1208 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 283 OF 2006. IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3658 OF 2004. IN SUIT NO.3354 OF 2004
Rajan Brijmohan Kapur. ... Appellant. Versus. Mahendra Jaichand Kapoor & others. ... Respondents.
Shri R.D.Dave i/by M/s.N.N.Vaishnawa & Co. for the Appellant.
Shri A.Dasgupta i/by M/s.J.Narula Associates for the Respondents.
CORAM : KSHITIJ R.VYAS, C.J., & ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th July, 2006.
P.C.:
clause (a). Motion disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
ABHAY S.OKA, J.
Rajan Brijmohan Kapur
Mahendra Jaichand Kapoor
KSHITIJ R.VYAS
ABHAY S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
