The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable since the challenged order originates from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MSS
: 1 :
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29386 OF 2002
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1090 OF 2001
---------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office :
Memoranda of Coram, :
appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders
orders or directions :
& Registrar’s orders. : .
---------------------------------------------------------
Mr. S.M. Railkar for appellants
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
19/8/2006
P.C.:-
The order challenged in this
Letters Patent Appeal is passed in
writ petition filed under Article 227
of the Constitution of India. Hence
the present Letters Patent Appeal is,
not maintainable and is dismissed as
not maintainable.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Letters Patent Appeal challenging an order in a writ filed under Article 226 is maintainable.
Ranjana Desai
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court