The single judge held the appeals to be infructuous as the duration for which the trustees were appointed had expired and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.74 OF 2005
alongwith
FIRST APPEAL NO.75 OF 2005
Babasaheb Namdeo Barate ..Appellant
versus
Sanjay Dyanoba Barate
& Others ..Respondents
V.S.Gokhale for the Appellant
Coram : S.R.Sathe, J.
Dated : 10th Jan, 2006
P.C.
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant.
The learned Advocate fairly submits that the appeal
has become infructuous, in as much as the duration
for which the trustees were appointed has expired.
Hence, appeal is disposed of being infructuous.
(S.R.Sathe, J.)
Babasaheb Namdeo Barate
Sanjay Dyanoba Barate
S.R. Sathe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court