The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai v. Shri Shantilal B. Maru
Bombay HCFA/2084/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A structured order granting time to remove office objections, admitting appeal, dispensing with printing, and directing service of notice.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
-1-
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
¶3
FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.15312 OF 2000
¶4
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
¶5
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
¶6
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATED: AUGUST 3, 2006.
¶7
P.C.:
¶8
1. Time of eight weeks is granted to
remove office objections. If objections
are not removed within stipulated period,
Appeal will stand dismissed for want of
prosecution without reference to the
Court.
¶9
2. Admit. Hearing is expedited.
¶10
3. Printing is dispensed with. The
Appellant is directed to file private
paper book along with sufficient number of
copies thereof within a period of six
months. from today. If the paper book is
not filed within stipulated period, the
Appeal will stand dismissed for want of
prosecution without further reference to
Coram
AI extract
A.S. OKA, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court