First Appeal No. 1834 of 2006. Order admits first appeal, expedites hearing, and later dismisses it for want of prosecution due to failure to file private paper-book within the stipulated period.
No paper-book filed within stipulated period; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1834 OF 2006.
Smt.Pratibha Nemchand Shah & others. ... Appellants. Versus.
Pradipkumar S.Shah & others.
... Respondents.
Shri Uday P.Warunjikar for the Appellants. Shri Z.R.Kulkarni for Respondent No.2. Ms.R.Bhargavan for the Respondent No.4.
CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J.
DATED : 3rd August, 2006.
P.C.:
appearing for Respondents Nos.2 and 4 waive service.
| 2. | Printing | is disp | ensed with. | The A | ppellants | are | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| directed | to file |
private | paper | book | along | with | |||
| sufficient | number | of | copies | ther | eof |
within | a | period | of |
| one | year from |
today. | If |
the | paper | book | is | not | filed |
| within | the stip |
ulated | pe |
riod, | the | Appeal | will | stand |
dismissed for want of prosecution without further
reference to the Court.
| 3. | In additi | on to service through Court, the | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate | for | the | Appellants is directed |
to | serve | private |
| notice | to | the | Respondents by Regis |
tered | Post | A.D. |
| and/or Speed | Post A | .D. and/or | by hand delivery. | |||
| Hamdast allo | wed. |
Judge.
Smt. Pratibha Nemchand Shah & others
Pradipkumar S. Shah & others
Abhay S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
