In this customs appeal, the appellant challenged an order regarding clearance of goods. The court held that the appeal raised no substantial question of law and dismissed it summarily without detailed reasoning.
Customs Appeal No.4 of 2006 was dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CUSTOMS APPEAL NO.4 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Customs,
(Prev), Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Bagwe Udyog Limited .. Respondent.
Mr.A.J. Rana, senior counsel with Mr.K.R. Chaudhari
for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2006.
P.C. :
Mr.A.J. Rana, the learned senior counsel
submits that in fact nothing remains to be argued in
this appeal as the goods were allowed to be cleared
on 17th January, 1996.
2. The appeal does not give rise to any
substantial question of law.
3. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal raises any substantial question of law.
The Commissioner of Customs
M/s.Bagwe Udyog Limited
R.M. LODHA
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court