Disposed
Shri Sayed Babalal H., Old Goa. v. Shri Damodar S.Prabhu and Anr.
Bombay HCCRMA/292/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 292 OF 2006
IN
STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1906 OF 2006
SHRI SAYED BABALAL H., OLD GOA.
....Applicant
Versus
SHRI DAMODAR S.PRABHU AND ANR.,
....Respondents
Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.2.
Coram:N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:18th October, 2006
P.C.:-
Heard the learned Counsel on behalf of both the parties. Special Leave to Appeal.
Appeal be registered. Upon registration action in terms of Section 390 Cr.P.C. be taken by the learned J.M.F.C. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with.
Place the matter for final hearing after the receipt of records and proceedings as per turn.
The learned Counsel for the applicant undertakes to prepare a private paper book and furnish it to the opposite side and to the Court.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
RD.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHRI SAYED BABALAL H.
SHRI DAMODAR S.PRABHU AND ANR.
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court