Single judge passed an order dismissing the writ petition filed as a civil application for non-compliance of the order dated 6th December 2005 by the respondent.
The writ petition was dismissed with the civil application disposed of as per the order, and no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 662 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5215 OF 2000.
Laxmi Vishwanath Kshirsagar.
... Applicant.
V/s.
The Dean, Sarvopachar Rugnalaya & Anr.
... Respondents.
Ameya Tamhane i/b. Ms.Seema Sarnaik for the applicant.
D.A.Patil, A.G.P. for the respondents.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J.
DATED: 22nd March 2006.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the applicant/
original respondent.
| December, | 2005 was |
a conditiona |
l | order | and | the | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| said | order | has not |
been compli |
ed | with | by | the |
| respondents | in spite |
of grant |
of | suffi | cient | time | |
| to | deposit | the amoun |
t. Learn |
ed | A.G.P. | appearing | |
| for | the | respondents is |
also not |
in | a |
position | to |
| make | any | positive | statement | with | respect | to |
compliance of the order. There is no material on
record to suggest compliance of the said order.
In this view of the matter, petition is
dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated
6th December, 2005.
terms of this order with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of due to non-compliance of the order dated 6th December 2005.
Laxmi Vishwanath Kshirsagar
The Dean, Sarvopachar Rugnalaya
V.C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
