This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1009 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 8204 OF 2005
Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport
And General Kamgar Union ... Petitioner
Versus
Shri. Jasbirsingh Amariksingh
Anand and Ors. ... Respondents
Ms. Bharati Patil for Applicant.
Mr. M.S. Karnik for R. Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for R. No. 4.
Ms. Lata Desai for R. No. 5.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 07, 2006
P.C.
. Matter not on board. By consent taken upon
board and heard forthwith.
. The Parties have no objection to the impleadment
of the applicants. Hence, application allowed in
terms of Prayer Clause (a). Amendment to the cause
title to add application be carried out within one
week from today. Civil Application disposed of
accordingly.
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
2
(DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)
Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union
Shri. Jasbirsingh Amariksingh Anand
F.I. Rebello
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court