Allowed
Yeravda Stud and Agricultural Farm v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/2983/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2983 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4997 OF 2006
------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s
Memoranda of Coram, orders
appearance, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders
------------------------------------------------------
Mr. C.M. Korde i/by M/s. Mulla & Mulla,
C.B. & C. for applicant.
Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for respondent
nos.1,3 and 6.
Mr.V.G. Mujumdar for respondent nos.4
and 5.
CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, &
J.H. Bhatia,JJ.
04/12/2006.
P.C.:
. Leave to correct.
. Heard. The Civil Application is
allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
Petition memo be amended accordingly
within one week.
(J.H. Bhatia,J.)(B.H.Marlapalle,J.)
applicant
respondent nos.1,3 and 6
respondent nos.4 and 5
B.H. MARLAPALLE
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court