The High Court dismissed an application seeking restoration of a writ petition after noting that respondents did not oppose the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2278 OF 2006 (For restoration) IN
WRIT PETITION NO.9148 OF 2005
Dilip S/o. Nivrutti Godse
V/s
The Maharashtra Public Service Commission and Anr.
.......Respondents.
Mr. Vijay Patil for Applicant
Mr. P.M. Pradhan for Respondent No.1
Mr. R.D. Rane, Government Pleader, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M.KANADE, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 5, 2006
P.C.
Learned Counsel for respondents do not oppose application for restoration. We accordingly recall the Order dated 23rd August, 2006 and restore the Petition. Civil Application is disposed of.
C HIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
2
Dilip S/o. Nivrutti Godse
The Maharashtra Public Service Commission
H.S. BEDI
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
