The State of Maharashtra v. Ramarao Changdev Bhosale and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.667 OF 2006
IN
FIRST APPEAL(St.) NO. 844 OF 2005
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.Y.M. Nakhawa, A.G.P.for the State. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 11TH AUGUST 2006
P.C. : 1. Hear learned A.G.P. for the Applicant. 2. Office notings shows that Respondents are duly served on the notice. None appears for the Respondents. 3. Sufficient cause is made out. 4. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
JUDGE
Parties & counsel
- respondent
The State
Coram
A.S. OKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court