This court made the Rule absolute in a civil application, finding sufficient cause for condonation of delay. The proceedings were wrongly captioned as a settlement suit.
Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
... 1 ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4650 OF 2005
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.22098 OF 2005
........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS
COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS
Shri P.P. Kakade for the Applicant.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : AUGUST 08, 2006.
P.C.:
the caption of "settlement".
| 2. | Offi | ce noting | shows | that | the | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respondents | are | duly | served | with | the | notice. | |
| None | appears | for | the | Respo | ndents. | ||
| Sufficient | cause | is |
made | out | for | cond | onation |
of delay. Accordingly, Rule is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay.
A. S. OKA
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
