The court, noting absent appearance by respondents, allowed the continuation of hearing and made the rule absolute to admit the first appeal. No substantive adjudication was delivered.
Rule is made absolute for admission of the Appeal; appropriate date assigned for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4132 OF 2005 IN
FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.19650 OF 2005
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
.............................................................
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATED: JULY 19, 2006.
P.C.:
1. Office noting shows that the
Respondents are duly served with the
notice. None appears for the Respondents.
Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause
(a). Office will assign appropriate date
for hearing as to admission of the Appeal.
Judge.
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court