The high court granted relief for restoration of a case and ordered service of private notice to respondents, with the application to be dismissed for non-compliance.
restoration; conditional service notice; dismissal on non-service
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 545 OF 2006.
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3215 OF 2006.
The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant. Versus. Shriramalu Timappa Mudgal. ... Respondent.
Shri Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the Applicant.
CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J.
DATED : 3rd October, 2006.
P.C.:
averments made in the application. Rule is made
absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
| board | on 22nd |
Decemb | er 2006 |
. T |
he Ad |
vocate | for | the | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant | to | serve | private | notice | to | the | Resp | ondents. | |
| Service | affidavit | to | be | filed | before | retur | nable | date. | |
| If | compliance | is not |
made | the | Application | will | stand |
dismissed for want of prosecution without further
reference to the Court.
Judge.
State of Maharashtra
Shriramalu Timappa Mudgal
Abhay S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
