The High Court of Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction considered a condonation of delay application filed by the applicant, who was incarcerated. Noting the appeal was filed through jail, the Court condoned the 10-day delay and disposed of the application.
The delay of 10 days in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI.APPLICATION NO.2339 OF 2005
IN
APPEAL NO.380 OF 2005
Ramlu Agamayya Margam ..Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
...
Ms.Rohini Dandekar Advocate (appointed) for
Applicant
Smt.V.R.Bhosale A.P.P. for State
CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 7, 2006
P.C.:
1. Heard. This application is filed for
condonation of delay of 10 days in filing the
appeal. The appeal is filed through jail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this
case and the appeal is filed through jail, the
delay is condoned. Application is disposed of.
[D.G.DESHPANDE, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 10 days in filing the appeal should be condoned given that the appeal was filed through jail.
Ramlu Agamayya Margam
The State of Maharashtra
D.G.DESHPANDE
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court