This criminal application sought condonation of 23 days delay in filing an appeal against conviction for murder. The applicant, a life convict, was in jail; the Public Prosecutor had no objection. The court condoned the delay and admitted the appeal.
Delay of 23 days was condoned and the criminal appeal was admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 687 OF 2006
IN
APPEAL NO. 622 OF 2006
Raju Ramvishal Chamar .. Applicant.
V/s.
State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
---
Shri Sachin Kadam with Miss M.V. Inamdar for the
Applicant.
Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent State.
---
CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE
S. A. BOBDE, JJ.
DATED : 02nd AUGUST, 2006.
P.C.:
1. Heard. This is an application for condonation
of delay of 23 days in filing the Appeal. The applicant
accused is in jail. He is convicted under section 302
of the IPC and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment.
The learned APP has no serious objection to condone the
delay. Therefore, the application is allowed and the
delay is condoned. The criminal Application is disposed
of.
2. Appeal admit.
(D.G.DESHPANDE,J)
(S.A. BOBDE, J)
-: 2 :-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 23 days in filing criminal appeal by an incarcerated applicant should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju Ramvishal Chamar
State of Maharashtra
D. G. DESHPANDE
S. A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court