The High Court of Bombay in Criminal Application No.48 of 2006 condoned a delay of 471 days for filing a criminal appeal under Section 302 IPC and admitted the appeal.
Delay of 471 days condoned; Criminal Appeal admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CRIMINAL APPALICATION NO.48 OF 2006
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.26 OF 2006
Shri Rahul Amin @ Bablu Abdul
Rauf Talukdar : Applicant.
versus
The State of Maharashtra : Respondent.
Mr.M.S.Mohite, for the applicant.
Smt.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for the State.
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE
V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ.
DATED : APRIL 10, 2006.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant/accused and the learned APP for the
State. This is an application for condonation
delay of 471 days in filing the present appeal.
2
The present applicant/accused has been convicted
for the offence punishable under Section 302. He
is in jail. Considering the circumstances, this
application is allowed. Delay is condoned.
Criminal Application is disposed of.
2. So far as Criminal Appeal is concerned,
heard both sides. Admit.
[D.G.DESHPANDE,J]
[V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 471 days in filing criminal appeal should be condoned.
Whether the criminal appeal should be admitted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Rahul Amin @ Bablu Abdul Rauf Talukdar
The State of Maharashtra
D.G.DESHPANDE
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court