Kinit Jayantilal Amin v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/239/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A second bail application was deemed inconsiderate due to the organized nature of the crime. The court, however, expedited the final hearing date.
What the court decided
AI extract
Issue for consideration
Whether the bail application should be considered given the organization of the crime and pre-sentence served.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.239 OF 2006
¶4
-------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
¶5
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr.M.H.Solkar for the applicant.
¶6
Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State.
¶7
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
¶8
Date : 4th April, 2006.
¶9
PC
¶10
1. This is a 2nd application
¶11
for grant of bail. Earlier
application for bail was
withdrawn as the same was not
pressed. On the facts of the
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the bail application should be considered given the organization of the crime and pre-sentence served.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Unknown Applicant
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
R.S.Mohite
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court