Partly allowed
Shri Balkrishna Narayan Alase v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPEAL/560/1989
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 560 OF 1989.
| Balkris The St |
hna Narayan Alase. Versus. ate of Maharashtra. |
... Appellant. ... Respondent. |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shri R Shri U. |
anjitsingh R.Bhonsale for the Appellant. V.Nikam, A.P.P.for the Respondent. CORAM : DATED : |
ABHAY S. 18th Augus |
OKA, J. t, 2006. |
|
| P.C.: | ||||
| . dictate |
For the reasons stated in the judgme d in open Court, the following order is passed: |
nt already | ||
| (i) | The impugned Judgment and aside. Consequently the conviction and sentence of the Appellant is quashed and set aside. |
order | is quashed |
and set |
| (ii) | The Appellant/Accused is punishable under section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. |
acq | uitted of |
offence |
| (iii) | The direction regarding return of muddemal articles is, however, confirmed. |
the | destruction | and/or |
| (iv) | The Appeal is allowed accordingly. | |||
| (v) | The fine amount, if recovered from the Appellant, be refunded to him. |
|||
| Judge. |
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal under Section 18 of the NDPS Act, 1985 should be allowed to quash conviction.
Whether the impugned judgment and conviction should be quashed and appellant acquitted.
Whether the direction regarding return of muddammal articles should be confirmed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balkrishna Natharayan Alase
State of Maharashtra
Abhay S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court