The suit was called for hearing. By consent, the suit against Defendant No.3 was disposed of based on mutually agreed consent terms signed by the parties and their advocates.
Suit against Defendant No.3 disposed of in terms of consent terms entered by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2971 OF 2006
Smt.Niranjana M. Shah ..Plaintiff
V/s.
M/s.Unitech Ltd. & Ors. ..Defendants
Mr.Ajay Khandhar i/b. Ajay Khandhar & Co. for the
Plaintiff.
Ms.Sonali Katoley for Defendant No.3.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 7TH NOVEMBER, 2006
P.C. :
By consent, the suit is placed on board and
called out for hearing.
2. By consent, the suit as against Defendant No.3
is disposed of in terms of the consent terms entered
into between the Plaintiff and Defendant No.3 and
signed by the Plaintiff and Defendant No.3 and their
Advocates. The Plaintiff and Defendant No.3 are
present in Court.
3. The consent terms are taken on record and marked
‘X’.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court