Dismissed
Keshav and Malonkar and Ors. v. Rosy Elias Kinny and Ors.
Bombay HCS/2766/1985
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of plaintiff and advocate.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.2766 OF 1985
Manohar Tukaram Halde Vs.
Smt. Rosy Elias Kinny & Ors.
..Plaintiff.
..Defendants.
Ms. Mamta Sadh, AGP for the State. Ms. Prabhu i/b Divekar & Co. for Defendant No.17. Mr. Dwij J. i/b Mahimtura & Co. for Defendant No.19.
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
th December, 2006.
P.C. :
The Plaintiff and his advocate are absent. The Suit is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
Smt. Rosy Elias Kinny
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court