The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of Suit No.2226 of 2006 based on consent terms signed by the parties, directing a decree as per those terms and refund.
Decree passed in terms of consent terms with refund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2226 OF 2006
Mohammed S. Badgujar....Plaintiff
V/s.
Pushpaben N. Patel & Ors.....Defendants
Mr.Rajiv Narula i/b M/s.Jhangiani, Narula & Associates
for the Plaintiff.
Mr.N.M. Shah for Defendant Nos.1 and 2.
Mr.Basant Trilokani for Defendant No.3.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J . DATED : 29TH AUGUST, 2006.
P.C. :
1.By consent the suit is placed on board and
called out for hearing.
2.The suit is disposed of in terms of the
consent terms signed by the parties and their
advocates. Mr.Narula, the learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the Plaintiff states that he has read
over and explained the consent terms to the Plaintiff
which he has accepted.
3.Accordingly there shall be a decree in terms
of the said consent terms.
.Refund as per rules.
Mohammed S. Badgujar
Pushpaben N. Patel
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court