Single judge allowed amendment to add parties and ordered suit to be finalized based on parties' consent terms, dismissing the dispute.
Amendment allowed within one week; suit to be decided according to consent terms signed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.219 OF 1975
Baburao Swamirao Nazare Vs.
Sanjay Namdeo Nazare & Ors. Defendants.
Mr. Naushad Engineer i/b M/s. Zaidy & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Ashok Purohit i/b Zohair & Co. for the Defendants.
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
21st December, 2006.
P.C. :
Draft amendment tendered. Counsel appearing for the contesting parties have received instructions to appear for the newly added parties. Amendment allowed, to be carried out within one week.
At the hearing of the Petition, Consent Terms have been
arrived at between the parties which are duly signed by the parties and by their respective advocates. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as 'X'. The dispute has been settled. There shall be an order in the Suit in terms of the Consent Terms.
Baburao Swamirao Nazare
Sanjay Namdeo Nazare
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
