Dismissed
Raosaheb Jayaram Thorat v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/9941/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a writ petition challenging compulsory retirement at age 50, the Court examined the petitioner's service records for the preceding five years. Finding the performance average or 'satisfactory' without 'good', the Court held no arbitrariness existed. Consequently, the petition was rejected with no interference. (15 words)
What did the court decide?
Writ petition rejected; order of compulsory retirement upheld as lawful and not arbitrary.