This order disposes of Writ Petition No. 966 of 2004 on the basis of consent terms signed by the petitioner and the respondent along with their advocates.
Disposed in terms of the Consent Terms signed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 966 OF 2004
Smt. Sharda Ramesh Gajangi ..Petitioner.
Versus
Shri Ramesh Mallaya Gajangi ..Respondent.
-----
Mr. A. I. Patel for the Petitioner.
Mrs. Anamika Vichare- Sarang for the Respondent.
-----
CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATED : 24TH OCTOBER, 2005.
P.C.:
1. The Consent Terms signed by the parties and
their Advocates are tendered and they are taken on
record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
2. This writ petition is disposed of in
accordance with the said consent terms.
DT. 24.10.05 (S.A.BOBDE,J)
Smt. Sharda Ramesh Gajangi
Shri Ramesh Mallaya Gajangi
S. A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court