The parties amicably settled the writ petition; the settlement terms were recorded. The petition is disposed of, and the interim order is vacated.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of settlement; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 958 OF 1999
Dayashankar B. Yadav and Ors.
..Petitioners
Versus
Smt. Samjuben Ajmera Trust and Ors. ... Respondents.
Ms. Ranjana Todankar with Mr. S. Mahadeshwar for the petitioners. Ms. Sindhu Shreedharan for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 .
P.C.
The parties have amicably settled the matter. The terms of settlement are at Annexure “A” to the Minutes of order. Minutes of order tendered in Court, taken on record and marked “X” for identification. This petition is disposed of in terms of the Minutes of order. The interim order is vacated.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
Dayashankar B. Yadav and Ors.
Smt. Samjuben Ajmera Trust and Ors.
Dalveer Bhandari
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
