The court recalled an incorrectly transcribed order dated 24th February, 2005, and extended the deadline for depositing court fees by one week.
Recalled the wrong transcribed order and extended time to deposit by one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8197 OF 2003
Shankar D. Adarshe & Ors. ..Petitioners
Vs.
The United Western Bank
Limited & Ors. ..Respondents
-----
Mrs. Anjali Helekar for Petitioners
Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar for Respondent No.1
Mr. S.S. Pakale for Respondent Nos.4 to 6 & 8
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO &
S.P. KUKDAY, JJ.
DATE: 24TH MARCH, 2005.
P.C.
. Pracipe has been taken out for speaking to
the Minutes of the Order. We find a wrong order has
been transcribed. In the light of that the order
dated 24th February, 2005 written in the Farad Sheet
is recalled. Office to place on record the correct
order dated 24th February, 2005.
. Considering the above, time to deposit is
extended by further period of one week.
. Office to issue certified copy of the order
as now substituted.
(F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(S.P. KUKDAY,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should postpone the time limit for depositing the balance Court Fee due to an erroneous transcription of the order.
Shankar D. Adarshe
The United Western Bank Limited
F.I. REBELLO
S.P. KUKDAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court