Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition after registering a complaint elsewhere; court allowed withdrawal without expressing an opinion on merits.
Leave to withdraw the petition allowed; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 778 OF 1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of :
of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders
and Registrar’s orders. :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mrs. Santosh Mishra i/by Sanjay Mishra
for the petitioner.
Mr. B.H. Mehta, A.P.P. for the
respondents.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
P.V. KAKADE, JJ.
DATED: 4TH APRIL, 2005
P.C.:
1. Heard learned advocate for the
petitioner who states that in view of
the fact that the respondents have
registered the complaint made by the
petitioner as non-cognizable complaint
as has been revealed to the Court by
as has been revealed to the Court by
the lealrned A.P.P. today, the
petitioner desires to approach the
learned Magistrate with the appropriate
complaint and, therefore, craves leave
to withdraw the petition. The petition
is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn
and stands disposed of as withdrawn.
It is made clear that this Court has
not expressed any opinion on the merits
of the case.
(R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.)
Mrs. Santosh Mishra
Respondents
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
P.V. Kakade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court