The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition held infructuous as the competent Civil Court had already decided the underlying civil suit in favour of the respondents.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7235 OF 1999
Shri Bhika Bala Deepale (Gavali)
& Others............ ... ...... Petitioners.
Versus
Pundlik Pandurang Jadhav & Ors........ Respondents.
Mr. V. Z. Kankaria for the Petitioners.
Mr. K. Y. Mandlik for Respondent Nos.5 & 7.
CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATED : 5TH MAY, 2005.
P.C.:
Mr. Kankaria, learned Counsel for the
petitioners states that the competent Civil Court has
decided the civil suit in favour of the respondents.
It is, therefore, clear that the present writ petition
as become infructuous. Writ Petition is dismissed
accordingly.
Sd/-
(S. A. BOBDE, J.)
Shri Bhika Bala Deepale (Gavali) & Others
Pundlik Pandurang Jadhav & Ors.
S. A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court