The High Court dismissed the writ petition after the respondent State Election Commission committed to deciding the budget application within four days. No substantive decision on the merits was reached.
The writ petition was dismissed as nothing further survives after the respondent's undertaking to decide within four days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 599 OF 2005
Mrs.Shakuntala Gajanan Patil........ .... Petitioner.
Versus
The Nalasopara Municipal Council & Ors......
Respondents.
Mr. Y. S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. S. Datar for the Petitioner.
Mr. R. V. More for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C. J. & S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2005.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2, The State
Election Commission, states that if an application is moved for grant
of permission to present budgets, the same would be decided within
2
four days of the receipt of the application from the petitioner.
petition and this petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
S. A. BOBDE, J.
Mrs. Shakuntala Gajanan Patil
The Nalasopara Municipal Council
The State Election Commission
Dalveer Bhandari
S. A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
