Allowed
Parvathi Ganga Sailoo v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/5261/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE.
WRIT PETITION NO. 5260 OF 2005.
Idulla Babu Rao. .. Petitioner. vs. Union of India. .. Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 5261 OF 2005.
Parvathi Ganga Sailoo. .. Petitioner. vs. Union of India & anr. .. Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. :
Shri S.N. Kantawala with Yogesh Rohira for the petitioners. Shri H.V. Mehta with Kiran Kandpile i/b T.C. Kaushik for the respondents. (in both matters).
CORAM: V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 14.9.2005.
P.C.:
. Heard rival parties. 2. On the motion made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, he is allowed to withdraw these petitions with liberty to make a representation and/or appeal as may be available in law. In that event, it would be open for the authorities concerned to decide the same on its own merits.
Idulla Babu Rao
Union of India
Parvathi Ganga Sailoo
Union of India
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court