Writ petition held infructuous after dismissal of a connected petition; dismissed as withdrawn; rule discharged and interim relief vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; rule discharged; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4566 OF 1992
Pullayya Irayya Komti and Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Pandurang A. Yemul and Ors. Respondents
Mr. A.P. Kulkarni holding for Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni for the petitioners.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. &
S.A. BOBDE, J.
DATE: FEBRUARY 01, 2005 .
P.C.
Mr. A.P. Kulkarni, learned advocate, on instructions from
Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that this petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. He further submits that other connected Writ Petition being Writ Petition No. 4565 of 1992 was already dismissed by order dated 14th January, 2003. This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief stands vacated.
CHIEF JUSTICE
-2-
S.A. BOBDE, J.
-3-
Pullayya Irayya Komti
Pandurang A. Yemul
Dalveer Bhandari
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
