Allowed
Pradeep Devidas Malolkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/4252/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In Writ Petition No. 4252 of 2005, the Division Bench was asked to determine if a petitioner reinstated without backwages should count interrupted service for superannuation purposes. The bench directed that the petitioner be treated as being in continuous service from entry to superannuation.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner is directed to be treated as in continuous service from the date of entry in service till superannuation for calculating superannuation benefits.