A writ petition challenging election matters was dismissed because the elected process was already completed, rendering the petition infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4026 OF 2004
Balaso Vasant Patil,
..Petitioners
Respondents
Vs
The State of Maharahtra and ors.
Mr Dinesh W.Bhosale, for the petitioners.
Mr M.H.Solkar, AGP for the respondents.
CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2005.
P.C.
1.Mr. Solkar, learned AGP, submits that the
process of elections has already been completed long
back and, therefore, this petition has become
infructuous. In view thereof, Mr Bhosale, learned
counsel for the petitioner, did not press this
petition. The writ petition is, accordingly,
dismissed as infructuous.
(D.B.Bhosale, J.)
Balaso Vasant Patil
The State of Maharashtra
D.B. Bhosale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court