Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order. Court granted the prayer.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to file an appeal
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 36 OF 2005
SMT.KAMALA DIGAMBAR KHATKHATE AND ORS.,
....Petitioners
Versus
MADHURI P.BAOKAR AND ORS.,
....Respondents
Ms. Subhalaxmi S. Naik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Coram:R. M. LODHA, J.
Date:29th September, 2005
P.C.
Ms. S. Naik, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned order is appealable and by inadvertence the writ petition has been filed. She seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order.
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
R. M. LODHA, J.
ssm.
KAMALA DIGAMBAR KHATKHATE AND ORS.
MADHURI P. BAOKAR AND ORS.
R. M. LODHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
