Harishchandra R.Achrekar v. the Trustees of Mumbai Port Trust
Bombay HCWP/3225/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO.3225 OF 2005
¶5
Shri Harishchandra Rajaram Archrekar.. Petr
¶6
v/s
¶7
The Trustees of Mumbai Port Trust .. Respt
¶8
Mr.V.Narayanan for Petr.
¶9
Mr S.K.Talsania i/b Motiwala & Co for Respt
¶10
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 13th July 2005.
¶11
P.C.
¶12
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned
counsel for the petitioner states that about 5
employees employed in the canteen after the cut-off
date and who were similarly situated with that the
petitioner have been regularised in the employment
of the respondent. The petitioner has been
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shri Harishchandra Rajaram Archrekar
- respondent
The Trustees of Mumbai Port Trust
Coram
AI extract
D.G. Karnik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court