In a writ petition, the Bombay High Court directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificates Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's case within three months and restrained the third respondent from cancelling his appointment during that period.
Direction to Committee to decide within three months; interim stay on cancellation of appointment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2829 OF 2005
Ramesh Nana Morajkar.. ...... ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... ..... Respondents.
Mr. Pai i/by Mr. R. K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner.
Mr. R. D. Rane, Addl. G. P. for the Respondents.
CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATED : MAY 2, 2005.
P.C. :
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner's case is pending before the Scheduled Tribe Caste
Certificates Scrutiny Committee, Konkan Division, Thane,
2
respondent No.2.
the case of the petitioner and decide the same as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of this order. During the interregnum period the
we direct the respondent No.3 not to cancel petitioner's appointment.
accordingly, disposed of.
Sd/
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/
S. A. BOBDE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificates Scrutiny Committee should scrutinize the petitioner's case with expedited timelines.
Ramesh Nana Morajkar
State of Maharashtra
Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificates Scrutiny Committee, Konkan Division, Thane
Dalveer Bhandari
S. A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
