In this brief dismissal, the Bombay High Court rendered the rule absolute after confirming a lower court order that set aside an Industrial Court order and condoned delay. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.
The rule is made absolute and the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2800 OF 2005
Mr. Raju Vithoba Sukhdare ... Petitioner
V/s
The Gr. Bombay Co-op. Bank Ltd. & anr. ... Respondents
Ms. Sonia Miskin for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Pai i/by Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the
respondents.
CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J.
DATED: 12TH DEC., 2005
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None for
the respondents.
2. Perused the order passed on 29th November, 2005
whereby the delay is condoned and the order passed by
the Industrial Court, Mumbai, allowing the revision
application is set aside.
3. Consequently, the rule is made absolute and petition
is disposed of with no order as to costs.
C. c. expedited.
Mr. Raju Vithoba Sukhdare
The Gr. Bombay Co-op. Bank Ltd.
P.V. KAKADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court