Disposed
Dr. Madhusudan v. Gosavi. v Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2) Nasik and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2738/1994
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2738 OF 1994
Dr. Madhusudan V. Gosavi ...Petitioner.
V/s.
Income Tax Officer, Ward
1(2), Nashik and Others ...Respondents.
Mr.Atul Jasani with Mr.Pramod Vaidya for the
Petitioner.
Dr.P.Daniel for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 8th August, 2005.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner
and the learned counsel for the Respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states
that within a period of 4 weeks, the Petitioner will
submit their objections with regard to the proposed
re-opening of the assessment under section 148 of the
Income Tax Act.
3. Dr.Daniel for the Respondent states that if
such objections are filed within a period of 4 weeks,
the concerned officer will pass a reasoned order
within a period of 12 weeks thereafter.
: 2 :
4. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in above
terms.
5. Issue certified copy.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
Dr. Madhusudan V. Gosavi
Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Nashik
S. Radhakrishnan
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court