Disposed

Ramji S. Patel v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Feb 2005WP/2709/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

No substantive matter. The petitioner failed to comply with requirements for a licence application. The court granted liberty to comply within two weeks and directed authorities to decide the application within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to comply with requirements within two weeks; authorities directed to dispose of application within four weeks.

Ramji S. Patel Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2005)

¶1

 : 1 :

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2709 OF 2004

¶3

 ------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders
 of Coram, appearances, Court’s
 Orders or directions and
 Registrar’s Orders
 ------------------------------------------------------------------
 None for Petitioner
 Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State

¶4

 CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKER &
 P.V.KAKADE, JJ.
 DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2005.
 P.C.

¶5

 . None present for the Petitioner.
 The learned APP states that inspite of
 repeated reminder to the Petitioner to
 comply with the necessary requirements
 the Petitioner has not so far complied
 the said requirements. Unless the
 petitioner complies with the necessary
 requirements it is not possible for the
 authorities to dispose of his

¶6

 : 2 :

¶7

 application for licence. While granting
 liberty to the petitioner to comply with
 such requirement within two weeks from
 today, and in any case thereof, the
 authorities shall thereafter dispose of
 the application of the petitioner within
 four weeks. With this direction the
 Petition is disposed of.

¶8

 R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.

¶9

 P.V.Kakade, J.

Ramji S. Patel v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramji S. Patel v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harishchandra Trimbak Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Maqbool Rahimullah Khan Vs Amitabh Gupta and Ors.

Yusuf Alamash Daryavardi and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra.

M/S. Hanil Era Textiles Ltd. and Ors. Vs the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Tapan Prasad Bagchi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vasantraodada Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.