The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No.2525 of 2004. The court noted that the parties had resolved disputes and executed a signed consent order, which was taken on record and the petition was accordingly disposed of in terms thereof.
Order in terms of the consent order signed by the parties and filed on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2525 of 2004
Chowgule & Company Limited.. Petitioner
versus
United Mines Workers Union & ors.. Respondents
Mr.P.K.Rele i.b Mr.Piyush Shah for Petitioner
Mr.S.M.Dharap i/b Mr Neel Helekar for Respondent
no.1
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 9th August, 2005.
P.C.
1. Learned counsel for the parties state that the
parties have resolved the disputes and hand in the
consent terms signed by the petitioner and
secretary of the respondent union and also by the
concerned workman. Consent terms are also signed
by the respective advocates appearing for the
parties. Signatures of the petitioner and
secretary of the respondent-union are identified by
2
their respective advocates. Consent terms are
taken on record and marked X for identification.
There shall be order in terms of consent order.
2. Writ Petition is disposed of.
D.G.KARNIK, J
Chowgule & Company Limited
United Mines Workers Union
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court