Petitioners sought to withdraw Writ Petition No. 2222 of 1993 regarding rights/Harappan. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2222 OF 1993.
Indian Heritage Society & others. ... Petitioners Versus. Union of India and others. ... Respondents. Ms.Dimple Mehta i/by M/s.M.V.Jayakar & Co.for the Petitioners. Shri S.P.Bharucha, Senior Advocate with Shri N.D.Sharma for the Respondent No.1-Union of India.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI &
ABHAY S. OKA, JJ.
DATED : 21st November, 2005.
P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that she has instructions to withdraw the petition. Hence the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(Smt.Ranjana Desai, J.)
(Abhay S.Oka, J.)
Indian Heritage Society & others
Union of India and others
Ranjana Desai
Abhay S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
