The court dismissed the criminal writ petition as the stated reason for protection order remained satisfied, keeping rights of petitioner for such complaint alive.
Petition dismissed; protection order continued as of order date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Writ Petition No.1943 of 2003
M/s.Prakash Cotton Mills Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. The Sr.Inspector of Police, Malad Police Station & Ors. .. Respondents
Respondents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memorandum Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri S.P.Kadam for the Petitioner.
Shri A.M.Shringarpure, APP for State.
CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ
DATE : 13th JULY, 2005
P.C.
such complaint alive, this petition is
dismissed.
( V.G.PALSHIKAR, J )
( R.C.CHAVAN, J )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging protection granted requires interference given that the protection continues.
M/s. Prakash Cotton Mills Ltd.
The Sr. Inspector of Police, Malad Police Station
V.G.Palshikar
R.C.Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
