On the closure of investigation without disclosure of offence, petitioners abandoned their claims. The court disposed of the writ petitions as not pressed for any relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1814 OF 2004
Tapan P. Bagchi .... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1815 OF 2004
Sambandam Narayanswamy .... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
Ms Soma Singh with Shri Mahesh Londhe
i/b M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the
Petitioners.
Shri B.H. Mehta, A.P.P. for the
Respondent No.1.
Shri Ganesh Gole for the Respondent
No.2.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
P.V. KAKADE, JJ.
DATED: FEBRUARY 03, 2005
P.C:
The learned A.P.P. informs that the
complainants have been informed by letter dated 3-2-2005
that the enquiry carried out pursuant to the complaints
does not disclose any offence and therefore in the
absence of any proof in support of the complaints, the
enquiry has been closed. The learned Advocate for the
respondent No.2 states that such an intimation has been
received by him only today in the Court. The learned
[2]
Advocate for the petitioners states that in view of
closure of the enquiry, the petitioners do not press for
any relief in the matter. The petition is, therefore,
disposed of as not pressed for.
(R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.)
(P.V.Kakade, J.)
Tapan P. Bagchi
Sambandam Narayanswamy
State of Maharashtra
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
P.V. Kakade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court