Manish C. Lakhani v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/172/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Rejects a criminal writ petition challenging the lower court's refusal to examine a Chartered Accountant and Income Tax Officer. The High Court held no irregularity occurred given the complainant ceased filing tax returns in 1995, while the alleged transaction occurred in 1998.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
: 1 :
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.172 OF 2005
¶4
Manish C. Lakhani .. Petitioner
(Orig. Accused)
Vesus
¶5
The State of Maharashtra and Anr... Respondents
¶6
Mr.K.D.Kagtala for petitioner
¶7
Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State
¶8
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKER &
P.V.KAKADE, JJ.
DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2005.
¶9
P.C.
¶10
. The petitioner challenges the order passed by
¶11
the Court below rejecting the application for
¶12
examination of the Chartered Accountant and the Income
Tax Officer. The Application has been rejected mainly
on the ground that the complainant has clearly stated
that he has stopped filing of Income Tax Return since
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether there is any irregularity in the lower court's rejection of an application to examine a Chartered Accountant and Income Tax Officer.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Manish C. Lakhani
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra and Anr
Coram
AI extract
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKER
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court