The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to file a representation before the University of Mumbai. The Court granted leave and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1653 OF 2005
Jaichitra Balakrishnan
.....Petitioner
Versus
University of Mumbai and Ors.
... Respondents.
Mr. Mihir Desai for the petitioner. Mr. M.D. Naik for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. C.T. Chandratre for respondent No.3.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATE: OCTOBER 03, 2005 .
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition in order to file a comprehensive representation before the University of Mumbai. We hope and trust that the representation of the petitioner so filed shall be decided expeditiously by the University of Mumbai. Leave as prayed is granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
Jaichitra Balakrishnan
University of Mumbai
Dalveer Bhandari
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
